I’ve been playing blackjack for quite awhile using basic strategy, mostly betting an even unit each hand. It would take about 5 years playing blackjack 40 hours a week before this piece of advice saved the player one unit. Following this rule will result in an extra unit once every 1117910 hands. So standing is the marginally better play.

The two right numbers in the bottom row show that the overall expected value for hitting is -0.540355 and for standing is -0.540293. But is there any truth in this? Obviously the dealer is inconsequential to the cards dealt (I like to say the dealer is 'simply a messenger of the cards') but are streaks in an 8-deck shoe inevitable, and even predictable? Or is it more like your roulette example, where the odds of each new round are exactly the same? Thanks once again for your web site. Well, more of an observation: when the dealer pulls a 5 on a 16 for their sixth consecutive win, there's always someone who gets up and leaves the table, muttering that the dealer is a mean cruel heartless soul, and goes in search of a 'hotter' table. I always check out your site before I head to Las Vegas or Lake Tahoe just to remind me how to play smartly.Īnyway, on to my question. Your information is quite valuable to both the beginning and expert gambler, and you present your findings in a pleasant, understandable, and even humorous manner.

First of all, I would like to add my name to the growing list of people who love your web site.

What is buster blackjack